التدريس من قِبل الأقران كمُيسِّر للوصول للمتعلمين المتقدمين

Habbar Hussein Jasim

doi:10.64337/rgj.v1i4.144

Authors

Habbar Hussein Jasim Department of English Language, College of Basic Education, Mustansiriyah University, Iraq.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.64337/rgj.v1i4.144

Keywords:

Peer tutoring, mechanisms, training, tutors, academic performance.

Abstract

This study was designed to investigate the effectiveness of peer tutoring in advancing diverse areas of learning among undergraduate and postgraduate students. It focuses on the perceived cognitive, academic, and socio-emotional impacts of peer tutoring and identifies challenges in its implementation.
The research was conducted using structured questionnaires distributed to 30 teachers and 50 advanced student tutors. The findings indicate that the majority of teachers and students (80% of respondents) view peer tutoring as an effective tool that benefits not only the tutees' performance but also the tutors' understanding and leadership skills.
However, the study also revealed concerns such as limited preparation time, a potential negative impact on tutors' academic grades, and a lack of clear support mechanisms. Based on these results, the study recommends integrating peer tutoring into curricula by providing rigorous training for tutors and offering institutional support to ensure the sustainability and effectiveness of these programs.

References

1. Chan, L. K. S., & Lai, P. Y. (2007). Enhancing metacognitive skills through peer tutoring. Instructional Science, 35(3), 205–225. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-006-9015-7

2. King, A. (1998). Transactive peer tutoring: Distributing cognition and metacognition. Educational Psychology Review, 10(1), 57–74. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022622422067 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022858115001

3. Landrum, T. J., & McDuffie, K. A. (2010). Learning styles in the age of differentiated instruction. Exceptionality, 18(1), 6–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/09362830903462441 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09362830903462441

4. L Peer, M. (2018). Peer tutoring and its impact on advanced learners: A review of the literature. Journal of Advanced Education, 45(2), 115–130.

5. Lubienski, S. T. (2002). Research, reform, and equity in U.S. mathematics education. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 4(2–3), 103–125. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327833MTL04023_2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327833MTL04023_2

6. Mastropieri, M. A., Scruggs, T. E., & Berkeley, S. (2007). Peers helping peers: Promoting learning through peer tutoring. Intervention in School and Clinic, 43(1), 13–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/10534512070430010301 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/10534512070430010301

7. McMaster, K. L., Fuchs, D., & Fuchs, L. S. (2006). Research on peer-assisted learning strategies: The promise and limitations. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 22(1), 5–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/10573560500203491 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10573560500203491

8. Miller, R., & Hudson, P. (2007). Using peer tutoring in inclusive classrooms. Preventing School Failure, 51(4), 19–26. https://doi.org/10.3200/PSFL.51.4.19-26 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3200/PSFL.51.2.19-22

9. O'Donnell, A. M. (2006). The role of peers and group learning. In P. A. Alexander & P. H. Winne (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (2nd ed., pp. 781–802). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

10. Pomerantz, E. M., & Eaton, M. M. (2001). Maternal intrusive support in the academic context: Transactional socialization processes. Developmental Psychology, 37(2), 174–186. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.37.2.174 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037//0012-1649.37.2.174

11. Reis, S. M., & Renzulli, J. S. (2010). Is there still a need for gifted education? An examination of current research. Learning and Individual Differences, 20(4), 308–317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2009.10.012 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2009.10.012

12. Robinson, A., Shore, B. M., & Enersen, D. L. (2006). Best practices in gifted education: An evidence-based guide. Prufrock Press.

13. Rohrbeck, C. A., Ginsburg-Block, M. D., Fantuzzo, J. W., & Miller, T. R. (2003). Peer-assisted learning interventions with elementary school students: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(2), 240–257. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.95.2.240 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.95.2.240

14. Roseth, C. J., Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2008). Promoting early adolescents' achievement and peer relationships: The effects of cooperative, competitive, and individualistic goal structures. Psychological Bulletin, 134(2), 223–246. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.134.2.223 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.134.2.223

15. Topping, K. J. (1996). The effectiveness of peer tutoring in further and higher education: A typology and review of the literature. Higher Education, 32(3), 321–345. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00138870 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00138870

16. Topping, K. J. (2005). Trends in peer learning. Educational Psychology, 25(6), 631–645. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410500345172 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410500345172

17. Topping, K. J., & Ehly, S. W. (2001). Peer assisted learning: A framework for consultation. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 12(2), 113–132. https://doi.org/10.1207/S1532768XJEPC1202_03 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/S1532768XJEPC1202_03

18. VanTassel-Baska, J. (2003). Content-based curriculum for high-ability learners. Prufrock Press.

19. VanTassel-Baska, J., & Stambaugh, T. (2006). Comprehensive curriculum for gifted learners (3rd ed.). Allyn & Bacon.

20. Zimmerman, B. J., & Schunk, D. H. (Eds.). (2001). Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theoretical perspectives (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.